ISCAR View from the Field
The Silence in the Office
The morning after the Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS; Maryland) Board of Education finalized the Fiscal Year 2027 budget, the school counseling department felt noticeably heavier. The headlines focused on numbers: a $3.72 billion budget, a stubborn $36 million shortfall, and a stark line item detailing the elimination of 415 positions.
But on the ground, those numbers have names, faces, and empty desks.
When you’re a school counselor looking out into the hallway, the reality of these cuts hits hard. They aren’t just losing headcount; they are losing their partners in student services. With approximately 43 social worker positions and 119 special education elementary resource teachers erased from the organizational chart, the safety net in supporting students has been stretched to its breaking point.
At The Institute for School Counseling Advocacy & Research (ISCAR), we frequently analyze the systemic shifts in the school counseling profession. Right now, literature consistently demonstrates that role ambiguity and job overload are the primary organizational drivers of counselor burnout and career dissatisfaction (Cervoni & DeLucia-Waack, 2011). In the trenches of MCPS, that theoretical risk is about to become an everyday reality.
While we must acknowledge and express genuine relief that school counselor allocations themselves were largely spared from direct elimination in this budget cycle, we cannot mistake this for a victory. It is a hollow compromise. By stripping away adjacent multidisciplinary roles, the district has inadvertently set remaining counselors up for structural failure. When an entire profession is expected to absorb an unmanageable workload, its core efficacy is heavily compromised. If counselors are spread too thin and unable to show measurable, proactive impact, it quietly and dangerously positions their roles as the next vulnerable targets for elimination in future fiscal years.
The Needs of Students Haven’t Changed
To understand why these cuts are so catastrophic, you have to look at a typical morning in any Montgomery County public school.
Imagine a student walks into the counseling office in acute distress. Deep, complex family trauma combined with housing instability. In the past, a school counselor could walk that student down the hall to the school social worker, a specialized professional trained in intensive, long-term crisis triage and routing to community resources. Together, they formed a tag-team of support.
Now, imagine that same morning after the budget cuts have taken place. The social worker’s door is closed. The desk is gone.
The student’s trauma, however, has not vanished. It doesn’t disappear just because a line item was deleted from a budget. Instead, that student stays in the counselor’s office. Empirical data reveal that non-counselor-related duties and excessive administrative expectations are the single best predictors of counselor burnout (Moyer, 2011).
This creates a ghost workload, which is the accumulation of highly specialized tasks that automatically default to school counselors when peer multidisciplinary specialists are removed from the building. When you erase a specialized position, you do not erase the student’s need. You simply redistribute the crisis to whoever is left standing.
Later that afternoon, a teacher knocks on the door, concerned about an upcoming IEP meeting or a collapsing Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP). Without elementary special education resource teachers to manage that compliance, counselors are pulled away from direct student interaction to handle complex tracking and paperwork.
When counselors experience this level of extreme role stress and conflict, the entire school suffers; research shows that it significantly reduces the overall quantity and quality of proactive, comprehensive student services a counseling department can implement (McKinzy et al., 2023). Proactive classroom lessons and preventive mental health programming are pushed aside, leaving counselors operating purely as reactive fire-extinguisher operators (Jorgenson, 2025).
The Role Assessment Mandate
If Montgomery County Public Schools expects its remaining staff to stay afloat, district leadership cannot simply tell counselors to “do more with less.” Structural issues require structural solutions. Recent empirical evidence highlights that educational leaders’ direct knowledge of school counseling frameworks is an important factor in how effectively counseling programs are supported and protected from administrative duties (Sabella et al., 2025). When school leaders establish and maintain a clear, shared understanding of these professional standards, counselors are shielded from burnout and can remain focused on the direct student services they were trained to deliver (Jorgenson, 2025).
To safeguard student care, MCPS must implement a protective framework before the first bell rings:
- The Time-Task Audit: Before schools open, building administrators must sit down with counseling teams to map out a strict audit of daily responsibilities against the ASCA National Model. They need a clear, data-backed baseline of exactly what tasks counselors are handling before the ghost workload begins to creep into their schedules.
- Establishing Boundaries: With fewer bodies in the building, the temptation to use counselors as operational band-aids will be immense. District leadership must issue non-negotiable mandates protecting counselors from inappropriate, non-counseling duties (such as morning bus duty, lunchroom supervision, testing logistics, etc.) (Jorgenson, 2025). Every minute spent proctoring a test is a minute stolen from a student in need.
- Intentional Prioritization: If a school loses its social worker or special education support, the district must officially sanction a reduction in other counseling deliverables. You cannot add long-term crisis management to a counselor’s plate without intentionally removing administrative burdens from the other side (Moyer, 2011).
Standing Up for the Support Services System
Budget crises force painful choices, but treating school counseling departments as an infinitely stretchable buffer for austerity is a dangerous gamble.
When counselors are forced to abandon proactive mental health advocacy to constantly extinguish systemic fires, chronic absenteeism rises, behavioral disruptions spike, and the mental health professionals left standing eventually choose to leave the career entirely (Jorgenson, 2025).
Socio-emotional infrastructure is not a luxury addition to public education; it is the baseline foundation that makes academic learning possible. As we navigate this lean year, district leaders must actively protect and assess the roles of those who hold our schools together. It’s time to ensure that the counselors standing up for MCPS students aren’t left standing alone.
References
Cervoni, A., & DeLucia-Waack, J. (2011). Role Conflict and Ambiguity as Predictors of Job Satisfaction in High School Counselors. Journal of School Counseling, 9(1), n1.
Jorgenson, Megan Jean, “Defining the School Counselor Role: A Training for Clarifying Responsibilities in Schools” (2025). Dissertations, Theses, and Projects. https://red.mnstate.edu/thesis/1026
McKinzy, A., Ratliff, C. H., Parker, C. H., Davis, J. D., & Davis, R. (2023). The Effects of Role Stress Elements on Primary School Counselor’s Perceived General Self-Efficacy. The Journal of the Research Association of Minority Professors, 25(2), 5.
Moyer, M. (2011). Effects of Non-Guidance Activities, Supervision, and Student-to-Counselor Ratios on School Counselor Burnout. Journal of School Counseling, 9(5), n5.
Sabella, R. A., Koklu, O., Tilman, A. L., Bixler, K., & Ungarean, M. (2025). A Preliminary Assessment of Educational Leaders’ Knowledge about School Counseling. Journal of Organizational and Educational Leadership, 11(1).
Leave a Reply